- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:48:18 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
As decided at the meeting: On 10/28/16 9:39 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > *QUESTION 1: What does it mean for a target to be "processed" as a > value? It's the term "processed" here that is problematic. Perhaps an > example would help, and then we could tweak the language. Proposed: The target of a shape that is the value of another shape MUST be ignored. (Alternate: The target *in* a shape... - I'm not sure what language we are using for the various components of shapes. It could be "The target that is a component of a shape ..." Any of those would be ok with me as long as we are consistent.) > > *QUESTION 2: Does "are" here mean "MUST"? (This is a question throughout > the document, actually, wherever "are" is used in this way. Perhaps we > can decide once for all.) Yes, MUST must be used here. -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2016 14:48:53 UTC