- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:55:22 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Luc, Yes, It is currently handled in the ontology, so I closed the issue. ISSUE-258 is related and asks for a consolidation of Attribution and Association (into one "Responsibility") while Responsibility would be renamed to something like "Delegation". -Tim On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > I have reassigned this issue the ontology. > I believe that you have implemented it and the issue can be closed. > Luc > > On 17/01/12 23:08, Luc Moreau wrote: >> Thanks Daniel, >> >> Tim, Could you confirm and reassign to prov-o? >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> On 17/01/12 11:28, Daniel Garijo wrote: >>> Hi Luc, >>> maybe this issue is more for the prov-o document than for prov-dm. >>> Currently, wasAttributedTo is binary. We should add a QualifiedInvolvement >>> for this relationship too in order to be able to add the set of optional attributes. >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> 2012/1/17 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >>> Hi Tim, >>> >>> Revisiting your request, I don't understand it. >>> An attribution record already contains optional attribute-value pairs. >>> What do you mean by qualified wasAttributedTo relation? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Luc >>> >>> >>> On 01/16/2012 02:31 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >>> Hi Tim, >>> This seems like a reasonable request. >>> It looks like all our relations should have attributes. >>> Luc >>> >>> On 01/15/2012 04:37 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/216 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: prov-dm >>> >>> Accounts will likely be associated to their asserters with the prov:wasAttributedTo binary relation. >>> >>> Would the DM be able to have qualified wasAttributedTo relations? >>> >>> I think that it would be a natural question for a consumer, upon hearing that "account x was from agent y", to want to ask about how, when, or in what situation agent y stated those things (e.g., under oath in a courtroom, on twitter 2am on a Friday night, etc). >>> >>> Hopefully, the Qualified wasAttributedTo would follow the pattern of the varying "precisions" (i.e., granularity) for wasDerivedFrom, which may relate an activity that draws the Account to the asserter. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Professor Luc Moreau >>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>> >>> >>>
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 01:55:53 UTC