- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:24:43 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@W3.org>
On Apr 26, 2012, at 07:51 , Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-04-25 22:56, Robin Berjon wrote: >>> Further more>if< the reference is to an IETF document for which the link will go 404 after the document expires, then I don't think that would be particularly defensible in a REC (not sure that's the case here, but links from a rec should be to documents that will, with high probability, remain accessible far into the future, IMO.) >> >> If IETF does indeed mint uncool URIs it's certainly a problem, but I would expect that problem to be taken to the IETF. As things stand though, the draft has expired but the link still works. >> ... > > The spec uses a URI on tools.ietf.org, which is *not* the official IETF URI for an internet draft. That's clearly a spec bug :) I'd recommend editing in place (but that's not a TAG decision to make). -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 08:25:13 UTC