- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:20:53 -0000
- To: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, We have a deadline to get editor's drafts of the SKOS Reference and SKOS Primer finished and reviewed before christmas. At the f2f, we set [ISSUE-39] ConceptualMappingLinks and [ISSUE-56] ReferenceSemanticRelationshipSpecializations as our two top priorities [1]. These are the issues we believe must be resolved in our first working drafts of SKOS. Can I add documentation (note) properties to our list of top priorities, which is covered by three issues: [ISSUE-27] AnnotationOnLabel, [ISSUE-64] TextualDescriptionsForConcepts and [ISSUE-65] XMLLiteralNotes. Based on these priorities, I would suggest the following action plan: 1. Propose a design to support concept mapping links, to resolve [ISSUE-39]. (Antoine has already made some suggestions here.) 2. For [ISSUE-56], make an initial decision to either (A) include broaderInstantive, broaderGeneric etc. in the normative SKOS reference, or (B) leave them to be defined as an extension module. 3. Open [ISSUE-64] and [ISSUE-65] -- I'm happy to be owner for these, unless anyone else wants to volunteer? 4. Propose a design for SKOS documentation properties which resolves [ISSUE-27], [ISSUE-64] and [ISSUE-65]. How does that sound? Thanks, Alistair. [ISSUE-27] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/27 [ISSUE-39] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39 [ISSUE-56] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/56 [ISSUE-64] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/64 [ISSUE-65] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/65 [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#item05 -- Alistair Miles Research Associate Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 15:21:17 UTC