- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:27:21 +0300
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: "Philip Taylor" <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sep 28, 2009, at 19:11, Toby Inkster wrote: >> This has not yet triggered the end of the world, so presumably RDFa >> in >> practice works fine without @version. > > It is not surprising that RDFa *currently* works in practice without > the > @version attribute, because *currently* only one version of RDFa is > defined. Defining versioning syntax now seems premature if the current de facto processing model is to ignore the versioning syntax (correct?) and the de facto authoring practice is not to emit the versioning syntax. If all goes well, versioning syntax is never needed. If things go wrong and in the future there is a need to signal versioning, that bridge can be crossed then and versioning syntax added. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 16:28:04 UTC