- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:44:37 +0100
- To: rdb2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
I've spent the day on R2RML and knocked a few actions and issues off the to-do list. > Implement ISSUE-34 resolution: drop rr:tableOwner, and instead state that rr:tableName MAY be qualified to include a schema name and a catalog name Done, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-table-or-view-name > Implement ISSUE-45 resolution by replacing literals for rr:termTypes with three new IRIs rr:IRI, rr:BlankNode, and rr:Literal Done, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#termtype and elsewhere > Implement ISSUE-47 resolution as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0084.htm and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0097.html and mark PENDINGREVIEW Done, mostly by adding a new subsection on data errors: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#data-errors Also: - improved the Vocabulary Summary section (ISSUE-53) - moved (with Boris' help) the extended example to the Test Cases (ISSUE-52) - gave up on ISSUE-49 (defining SQL terminology in R2RML) -- I defined one more non-obvious term in the spec, and that will have to do, so I'm now in favour of POSTPONE on this one Best, Richard
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 18:45:07 UTC