- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:29:22 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
See below, this ticket should be closed. PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-128 without action. Holger On 7/03/2016 9:06, Holger Knublauch wrote: > sh:defaultValueType is different from rdfs:range: > > 1) It only "fires" if the given resource has no other rdf:type already > > 2) The sh:defaultValueType can be a subclass of the rdfs:range, e.g. > the default value type of sh:constraint is sh:NodeConstraint, however > the range of that is sh:Constraint (superclass of NodeConstraint). > > HTH > Holger > > > On 7/03/2016 5:47, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> shapes-ISSUE-128 (rdfs:range): sh:defaultValueType is rdfs:range >> [SHACL Spec] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/128 >> >> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider >> On product: SHACL Spec >> >> Section 11 of the SHACL document discusses sh:defaultValueType. >> sh:defaultValueType is, in essence, rdfs:range. If SHACL is going to >> do RDFS processing, then it should use the RDFS vocabulary. >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 02:29:55 UTC