Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51

On 08/06/2015 04:39 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Quickly getting back to the topic of whether we need severity levels, we have
> an approved requirement captured as R10.1
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-shacl-ucr-20150414/#requirements-1
> 
> /"The language should allow the creation of error responses that can include
> severity levels as desired."/
> 
> So I believe the simplification proposed by Peter takes it a bit too far.

This is rather moot as the working group has decided to adopt a different
approach, but I want to put forward my view on whether my proposal went
against this resolution.

I agree that my proposal is pushing the boundaries of this resolution.  I did
point out how differing severity levels can be effected in my proposal.
Therefore, I don't view my proposal as violating this working group resolution.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:00:51 UTC