- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:50:12 -0700
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Holger, your "built-in" contains a concept of conformance. I think conformance, especially conformance to a particular technology, is a far horizon for us compared to where we are today.* So "built-in" may be premature. Perhaps this should wait. kc * I personally prefer conformance to be defined in terms of input/output or situational results rather than specific technologies. Conformance rules of the former type may better endure technology evolution. On 4/16/15 6:07 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Built-in here means part of the official spec (similar to how "my" draft > does this right now) - part of the "Full" language. Not just an example, > but mandatory for anyone claiming full SHACL support. > > HTH > Holger > > > On 4/17/2015 10:49, Karen Coyle wrote: >> Holger, it would help if you could define what you mean by "built-in." >> Do you mean included in the spec? If so, included as a complete >> solution, as an example, ????? >> >> Thanks, >> kc >> >> On 4/16/15 5:23 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in >>> extension language [SHACL Spec] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/45 >>> >>> Raised by: Holger Knublauch >>> On product: SHACL Spec >>> >>> I think there is enough agreement that SHACL should have an >>> "extension" language to cover cases not addressed by the core >>> vocabulary, and to define new high-level terms (templates). I believe >>> we should get the question clarified whether SPARQL is such an >>> extension language. This question is independent of whether other >>> languages such as JavaScript could also be supported - that would be >>> another ISSUE. >>> >>> PROPOSAL: SHACL should include SPARQL as an extension language. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 14:51:11 UTC