- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:36:28 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 4/15/15 4:32 PM, Simon Steyskal wrote: > Just for clarification: > >> So the main question here is whether SHACL should have such properties >> at all (and possibly a class sh:Graph to represent the graph itself). > > The graph that should be affected by shapes, i.e. should be considered > for validation? Yes, primarily. Although something like sh:include will also make sense between shape graphs. Holger
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 08:37:01 UTC