Re: extension model of RSS/Atom (ISSUE-16 discussion)

Hi Erik,

On 04/07/2015 10:06 PM, Erik Wilde wrote:

[...]

> Atom is doing things differently because XML provides a better way of
> separating vocabularies with namespaces. that's an important benefit
> that neither JSON nor JSON-LD have. that also makes it easier to
> separate possible future spec changes from openness/extensions. again
> that's something that we don't get out of the box.

Could you please explain how do you see JSON-LD not having capacity to
separate vocabularies with namespaces?

In my online profile ATM I use vocabularies from 8 different namespaces
and will add more in next updates, including "as":
"http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#"

$ curl https://wwelves.org/perpetual-tripper/  -H "Accept:
application/ld+json"

{
  "@context": {
    "@vocab": "http://schema.org/",
    "cco": "http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core#",
    "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
    "doap": "http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#",
    "opo": "http://online-presence.net/opo/ns#",
    "sec": "https://w3id.org/security#",
    "ldp": "http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#",
    "hydra": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#",
    "id": "@id",
    "type": "@type",
    "attendeeIn": { "@reverse": "attendee" },
    "authorOf": { "@reverse": "author" },
    "currentLocation": "opo:currentLocation"
  },
  ...
}