Re: shapes-ISSUE-33 (shape selection): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think that the issue is not whether shape selection is in a particular
part of the documenation, but whether shape selection is part of the
high-level langauge/core/lite.

My vote is that shape selection is an important part of SHACL and thus
deserves to be part of that distinguished part.

peter


On 04/01/2015 02:20 AM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to
> introduction? [SHACL Spec]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/33
> 
> Raised by: Simon Steyskal On product: SHACL Spec
> 
> Information on how to associate shapes with resources/data they constrain
> is imho very crucial and should be part of the introduction rather than
> being placed somewhere at the end of the specification.
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVHAtSAAoJECjN6+QThfjzPz4IAJB3/QDrfXHImpi1ui3KEAFr
s0FOxg6ssWtUMziWpjHgAx8Z6Qn+IaIAiUXZ2uoKXtdUVwJZmP5wmSqjJfMKhYU1
LB/M5nQoWb0lB3lZEpk+DLztKQUAEvCd6+wY2+rMhz1pyrod/5ZLprgaApnnGtu6
giHIm1ENnOlSH7AKohxjwvEPwOIGAsmx4UvrPiaEvSK/LkFpe/kd0LIAeysqwygJ
wZK8BAedjXWYP7Jc32qVVd+Ddvj+q0FN9t2GS2DZ7Pdy0Nyv4/xycidWFu95mu+i
bRXuXDNlslZ9JVDwwivnF81psag1c37o+XzD4mzcspggIK7YpARgRbeUmkSRACY=
=yHKb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 15:14:56 UTC