- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:21:33 -0800
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Thanks, Gregory, for scribing... > > Topics > 1. Convene HTML WG meeting of 2007-11-16T17:00:00Z > 2. ISSUE-18 html-design-principles HTML Design Principles > 3. ISSUE-19 html5-spec HTML 5 specification release(s) > 4. ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics requirement for Immediate Mode > Graphics and canvas element > 5. ISSUE-14 aria-role Integration of WAI-ARIA roles into HTML5 > 6. ISSUE-16 offline-applications-sql offline applications and data > synchronization > 7. outcome of HTML for authors session > > full text: http://www.w3.org/2007/11/16-html-wg-minutes The minutes say this: <DanC> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/19 DanC: had conversation with PTaylor about formal objection - action done ... completed action to email negative and non-responders - done Chairs have said the question does not carry -- WG will keep working on spec <DanC> DanC found out non-responders are not ok to publish I'd like to ask for some clarifications. 1) Which non-responders are not ok to publish? What are their specific objections and how can they be addressed? 2) Does this decision apply to the diffs document as well (which was a separate question in the survey)? Also, I'd appreciate it if the chairs could clearly state the decision and the reasoning behind it on public-html for discussion, since not everyone may have spotted it in the minutes. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 01:21:44 UTC