Re: ISSUE-132: compliance or tpe? from John Simpson on 2012-11-09 (public-tracking@w3.org from November 2012)

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:17:02 -0800
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-Id: <54BF59CF-0933-4008-A2BE-95386963B595@consumerwatchdog.org>

Thomas,

I agree with you.

John

----------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
2701 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 112
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
john@consumerwatchdog.org

On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> Reviewing a few issues, it looks as though ISSUE-132 should properly be against the tpe specification, not (as it currently is) compliance, and is probably dealt with by existing text.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/132
> 
> Thoughts?
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 20:17:05 UTC