- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:01:04 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
Note that we are expecting the drafts to be published likely Thursday,
possibly next Tuesday if the Webmaster notices any last minute errors.
However, don't worry - there will be new versions :)
cheers,
harry
On 01/20/2015 03:46 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> There won't be time before the next drafts are published. Feel free to
> submit issues or (even better) pull requests to fix any errors that you
> uncover and I'll make sure those are updated for the next working draft
> push.
> On Jan 20, 2015 6:40 AM, "☮ elf Pavlik ☮" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2015 07:27 PM, Social Web Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> social-ACTION-28: Prepare working draft for publication based on
>> http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html
>> by jan 16, 2105
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/28
>>
>> I started updating my script which tests examples in spec, tracking it
>> now in: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/65
>>
>> Currently examples have errors! At least when comparing JSON-LD and
>> Turtle. I can rather easily add checking also RDFa serialization.
>>
>> Also turtle in examples don't validate! I also will automate such checks...
>>
>> IMO we should get those examples to pass isomorphism checks among
>> included serializations ASAP! Of course I offer my help for JSON-LD,
>> Turtle and RDFa versions :)
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 15:01:12 UTC