- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:49:59 +0100
- To: public-appformats@w3.org
Dear, In http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xbl-20070117/ ==Normative Reference== Third edition of XML instead of fourth First edition of XMLNS instead of second ==Inconsistencies== evtGroup, but eventPhase initialize, initialized but initialisation focussed and focused are both used In 4.9.1. General Rules html:label, html:img and html:map but img, map and title (I understand non namespaced element in the document are in the XBL namespace) ==Strange point== In 1.4.3. Attributes Containing Space-Separated Values It's unclear to me wether you are speaking about before XML character normalisation or after. In either case, it seems flawed If it is before, to be consistent with XML behaviour, you missed the TAB (0x9) char in the space definition If it is after, all the 0xA, 0xD no more exist and have been replaced by 0x20 (see 3.3.3 Attribute-Value Normalization in XML) ==Schematas== It seems, the grammar of a valid xbl document is difficult to explain in DTD or XML Schema. Is it planned to provide a Relax NG+Schematron or even an NVDL for it ? ==Typo== s/favourite/favorite/ s/Feburary/February/ s/instace/instance/ s/programatically/programmatically/ s/recognise/recognize/ s/UA's/UAs/ (to be consistent with the majority) Regards, Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 20 January 2007 19:50:05 UTC