- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:49:36 +0000
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Dear all, As the flurry of new issues in your inbox shows, I've been working on the UCR doc today, see http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html. Changes made: - The Reqs that we resolved to remove have been removed. - The new use cases in the wiki have been added (except those proposed by Fraunhofer, see ISSUE-93 and ISSUE-94). - I have added some new requirements in based on my assessment of the new new cases. For each new proposed requirement I opened an issue. see ISSUE-83, ISSUE-85, ISSUE-86, ISSUE-87, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-89, ISSUE-91. Lewis, Annette, Eric - please take a look at what I've done to your use cases. In Annette's case I think we need to talk through what the possible reqs will be - I suspect there will be a lot of commonality with the RDESC one and we'll have some new reqs out of it. The R-Location requirement is one I added based on my own new use case (and I think it's useful in Lewis's too). But see Issue-96 as this use case is a little different - I'd like to essentially refer to the report of a workshop as the use case. There are other minor changes but those are the main ones. Not done yet - there's a good deal of housekeeping to do yet but I hope this counts as progress. Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 20:49:48 UTC