Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101]

I haven't seen any support for Lisa's straw-man proposals, and  
discussion seems to confirm the below as the direction we want to take  
this. Closing this one (although there may be other issues nearby...).


On 11/03/2008, at 4:03 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

>
> The only proposal I've seen for this is to remove the notion of  
> "semantic equivalence" and replace it with (roughly) "good enough,  
> from the server's point of view".
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 11:23:21 UTC