- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 08:11:39 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard, > Chairs, can we put this on the agenda of a (near-)future call? Thanks for this. Noted for next week. If we get through with ISSUE-42 today, maybe even today ;) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 30 May 2011, at 20:44, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > ISSUE-22: Support for database vendor specific SQL statements > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/22 > > The Editor's Draft currently states [1]: > >> In places where SQL expressions are allowed, these MUST conform to >> Core SQL 2008. > > PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-22 by adding the following text: > > [[ > The behavior of otherwise valid R2RML mappings that contain non- > conformant SQL expressions is undefined. > > If all SQL expressions in an R2RML mapping conform to a specific > version of SQL different from Core SQL 2008, then the mapping is > known as an *R2RML dialect mapping*. This specification defines no > particular behavior for dialect mappings. > ]] > > Chairs, can we put this on the agenda of a (near-)future call? > > Thanks, > Richard > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#sql-conformance
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 07:12:09 UTC