- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:03:38 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- CC: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 9/9/14 7:25 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 9/9/14 7:21 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> The key words in the final sentence are "this version of the URL spec". > > Please see Hixie's > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2014Aug/0092.html>. It might have been helpful if you had brought this up in the call. You seem to have elided the request for a statement of stability. This is a substantial portion of the published requirements for a stable specification[1]. Is it no longer the plan that the webapps working group is planning to produce a recommendation-track deliverable for the URL spec, as described by its charter[2]? Such a plan would have produced a demonstrably stable reference. In any case, this doesn't seem to be a process discussion any more. - Sam Ruby [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references#stability [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/06/webapps-charter.html
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 12:04:15 UTC