Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC

Dear WG,

I'm unable to connect on irc and voice, firewall problems I hope, so
I'll be on RDFa telecon. Have a nice telecon Group.

Cheers,

Simone

On 10/22/07, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
> Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC
> W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/
>    Tuesday, 1500 UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston / 1600 London / 1700 Amsterdam
>    Phone
>        Boston: +1-617-761-6200
>        Nice: +33-4-8906-3499
>        Bristol: +44-117-370-6152
>    Conference code 79394# ('SWDWG')
>    IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/swd Web-based IRC (member-only)
>
> Chair: Tom Baker
> Scribe: Clay (DanBri on deck)
> Regrets:
>
> Attendance of SWD WG telecons is restricted to registered WG
> participants and persons invited by the chairs.
>
> ======================================================================
>
> 1. ADMIN (10 min)
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Minutes PROPOSED to accept minutes of the previous telecon
> and of the face-to-face meeting in Amsterdam:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html
>     http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html
>     http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-swd-minutes.html
>
> Next telecons:
>
> -- Oct 30:  1500  UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston / *1500* London / *1600* Amsterdam
> -- Nov 06: *1600* UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston /  1600  London /  1700  Amsterdam
>    -- possibly cancel Nov 06 if many participants will be at http://www.w3.org/2007/11/TPAC/
> -- Nov 13: telecon cancelled because of ISWC in Korea.
> -- Nov 20:  1600  UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston /  1600  London /  1700  Amsterdam
>
> ======================================================================
> 2. Actions from pre-Amsterdam telecon (Oct 2) - mostly done?
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Ben to send formal request to send mail proposing Draft of RDFa Syntax and Publish new version of RDFa Primer, both on REC track) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-swd-minutes.html#action06]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Alistair to state the difference between the two flavours of the SimpleExtension proposal for issue 26 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-swd-minutes.html#action05]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: all to register (indicate also that you're not planning to attend and/or want to attend via telecon) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/02-swd-minutes.html#action09]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Antoine to make wiki page or list posting summarizing issues for "Concept Semantics" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/18-swd-minutes.html#action07]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Diego, Ed and Justin to review RDFa syntax document prior to f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-swd-minutes.html#action10]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Elisa to ask for feedback on VM draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/21-swd-minutes.html#action06]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to email a proposal to the list about Issue-36 ConceptSchemeContainment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/24-swd-minutes.html#action01]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to move ISSUE-26 forward [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action04]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to post user experience reports for ISSUE-25 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action05]
>
> [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
>
> ======================================================================
> 3. SWD review of "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web"
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Michael to summarize the discussion and the wiki page and formulate a scoping remark as a draft suggestion from SWD to the authors of Cool URIs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action08]
>
> Latest version of "Cool URIs"
> -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/2007/cooluris/doc-20071008.html
>
> Latest version of the draft review:
> -- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ReviewCoolURIs
>
> Discussion on list:
> -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0080.html
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0085.html
>
> ======================================================================
> 4. SKOS - see
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOS
>
> -- Review Amsterdam resolutions
>
>    RESOLVED (for subtopic B) The property extensions of skos:prefLabel,
>    skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel must be pairwise disjoint
>
>    RESOLVED (for subtopic C) A resource cannot have more than one
>    preferred lexical label per language (where it is assumed that each
>    distinct tag allowed by RFC 4646 denotes a distinct "language").
>
>    RESOLVED skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel are all
>    sub-properties of rdfs:label
>
>    RESOLUTION: The range of skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel and
>    skos:hiddenLabel is the class of RDF plain literals.
>
>    RESOLVED (for subtopic E) State in normative prose that the range of
>    the SKOS lexical labelling properties is actually the class of RDF
>    plain literals; retain the current declaration in RDF triples that
>    the range of these properties is rdfs:Literal.
>
>    RESOLVED that the validating application under discussion is a
>    vocabulary checker, and what we're trying to decide is how a
>    vocabulary checker should handle violations of constraints
>
>    RESOLVED where label properties are used as predicates the object
>    must be a rdf plain literal
>
>    [RESOLUTION??]: Accept the minimal label relation solution. Details/naming
>    to be worked out.
>
>    RESOLVED (subtopic G) use normative prose to state a semantic
>    condition on the interpretation of the three properties: prefLabel,
>    altLabel and hiddenLabel
>
>    RESOLUTION: all graph constraints should be moved into an
>    informative section
>
>    RESOLUTION: (for subtopic I): "there cannot be more than one
>    preferred lexical label per "language" for any give resource"
>
>    RESOLUTION (subtopic K): labelling properties are rdf:Properties and
>    owl:DatatypeProperties
>
>    RESOLUTION: we make no statement about the transitivity and
>    reflexivity of broader/narrower
>
>    RESOLUTION: skos:related MUST be interpreted as disjoint with the
>    transitive closure of skos:broader"
>
> -- Actions
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Guus to write up the issue [of Label Resource] and add to issue list.  [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action01]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: alistair to update semantics document to listing ways in which ways SKOS diverges from OWL DL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action06]
>
> ======================================================================
> 5. RDFa - RDFa Overview document
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/
>
>     Teleconferences take place Mondays, 1300-1400 UTC
>     irc://irc.w3.org:6665/rdfa, conference code 7332# ('RDFa').
>     Everyone interested in RDFa is invited to participate.
>
> -- Amsterdam resolutions:
>
>    RESOLUTION: to put RDFa syntax on rec track, other RDFa docs to W3C
>    Note.
>
>    RESOLUTION: resolved that, in preparing last call doc for RDFa,
>    decouple RDFa syntax document from any separate CURIE document.
>
>    RESOLUTION: to publish RDFa syntax document as First Public Working
>    Draft at the earliest possible convenience, no later than
>    moritorium, taking into account comments of reviewers as far as
>    possible, adding notes where there are open issues.
>
>    RESOLUTION: that RDFa use cases and primer are published as WG Notes
>    not later that syntax reaches recommendation status
>
> -- RDFa Primer - proposal to approve publication as Working Draft
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20070918/
>
> [NEW] ACTION: antoine to review RDFa Primer before next telecon (within two weeks). [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action01]
> -- DONE - Antoine's review (2007-10-18)
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0090.html
>
> -- Other
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action05]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Ben to update RDFa schedule in wiki [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_schedule] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action04]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action03]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Guus/Tom to propose joint decisions for reviews for major [RDFa] steps/transition requests. Informal agreement about working drafts. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action02]
>
> ======================================================================
> 6. RECIPES - see
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes
>
> -- Amsterdam resolutions
>
>    RESOLUTION: Recipe 6 recast as an implementation pattern. Example 3
>    of HTTP redirect made a little more complex to show an internal
>    query based response. Illustrative example on W3C.
>
>    RESOLUTION: Issue 24 resolved by referencing Cool URIs note
>
>    RESOLUTION: Hold (on Issue 58) until further information available
>
>    RESOLUTION: Issue 60 is out of scope of Recipes and is Closed.
>
>    RESOLUTION: Issue 20 resolved by adding a reference to Diego's
>    service
>
> -- Actions:
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Diego to recast Recipe 6 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action02]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Jon to add words that acknowledge the existence of RDFa as potential mechanisms, but it's out of scope here. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action06]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Jon to make changes as proposed [with regard to Issue-23] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action05]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Ralph to come up with a URI for wiki page [for Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action04]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action03]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: TF leaders to prepare a version of Recipes for review in December [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action09]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Guus/Tom to solicit reviewers for the Recipes document. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action08]
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Dan/Alistair to ask apache about conditional redirects [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action07]
>
> ======================================================================
> 7. VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT - see
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#VocabularyMgt
>
> [NEW] ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07]
>
>
>
> --
> Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 15:11:18 UTC