- From: Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:11:35 +0100
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
---------------------------------- 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome! 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions) ---------------------------------- --- Issues for this Call --- Note: See more info at the end for details. ISSUE-153 What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them? http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153
 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_limitations_for_add-ons January 15: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus January 29: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts ISSUE-197 How do we notify the user why a Disregard signal is received? http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/197 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_Disregard_signal Note: We would like to close this ISSUE by consensus, so the CfO procedure is only back-up. January 15: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus January 29: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts ISSUE-240 Definition of context https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/240 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_the_definition_of_context January 15: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals January 22: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal ISSUE-239 Should tracking status representation include an array of links for claiming compliance by reference? http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/239 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_status_URL_array_for_compliance_regimes January 15: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal January 22: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus ISSUE-241 https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/241 January 15: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals AoB Reminder for open Call for Objections ISSUE-151 User Agent Requirement: Be able to handle an exception request https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-exception-151/ Deadline - January 22 ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES ================= PHASES to resolve issues: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts M7 (announcement): Results are announced STATUS of the ISSUES: - OPEN During phases M0, M1, M2 - PENDING REVIEW: During phases M3, M5 - CLOSED after M7 All other issues are RAISED. ----- ================ Infrastructure ================= Zakim teleconference bridge: VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt OFFLINE caller identification: If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, please email your name and phone number to npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact, eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:12:05 UTC