- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:46:55 +0000
- To: Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 22/11/2013 21:23, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >> On 22/11/2013 20:56, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> Yeah, double-escaping isn't great. I'm fine with defining a smaller >>> ad-hoc syntax. Let's say: >>> >>> Four tokens: >>> >>> 1. Run of digits, ASCII letters, or non-ASCII characters. >>> 2. Single ASCII periods. >>> 3. Run of whitespace. >>> 4. Anything else. >>> >>> Presence of #4 invalidates the property. Throw away #3. #1 and #2 >>> constitute the cell names. >>> >>> This allows you to produce areas with awkward names to write as >>> idents, but it's nice and simple. >> >> Sounds good, though I would add dash and underscore (U+002D and U+005F) to >> 1, making it match "name code point": > > Oh, right, yes. My intention was indeed to match name code point. Rossen, any opinion on this? -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 09:47:24 UTC