Hi John, The point is that it's confusing to talk about parties, since a party can be either 1st or 3rd depending on context. If Company.com has content on Website.com, it's a third party in that context. If a user visits Website.com and then later visits Company.com directly, Company.com is then a first party. But what about the data Company.com collected on Website.com when Company.com was a third party? The point is that the rules attach based on the context of collection and use, not on the ephemeral nature of a party. Therefore, that's how we should describe the rules, else we risk not saying what we mean, and we risk confusing implementers and users. Does that make sense? -David On 2013-10-07 3:41 PM, John Simpson wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm having trouble understanding the distinction you are trying to > make. Doesn't a 3rd party collect in a 3rd party context? > > Could you please explain a little more what you mean? > > > Thanks, > John > > On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:44 AM, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com > <mailto:dwainberg@appnexus.com>> wrote: > >> Again, this is a case where talking about audience measurement data >> collected in a 3rd party context might be clearerthan talking about >> parties >
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2013 00:43:40 UTC