Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170)

On 2013-10-01 9:07 AM, Walter van Holst wrote:
> On 2013-10-01 15:00, David Wainberg wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> As the draft spec stands today, under DNT:1 third parties can collect
>> and use data with an exception or under the permitted uses. I don't
>> see the loophole. These exceptions are already agreed on.
>
> You are assuming that exceptions will always be granted. I rather 
> doubt that. As far as the permitted uses are concerned, I do not read 
> them as permitting to share DNT:1 data with third parties.
I'm not assuming that exceptions will always be granted. What does that 
have to do with it? And permitted uses will always be allowed.
>
> So Mike is right, this would create a glaring loophole, which would be 
> a no-no to me.
I still don't understand what the loophole is. Can you explain further?

-David

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 13:15:04 UTC