- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:32:40 -0400
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Fine by me. peter On 09/04/2013 06:53 PM, David Wood wrote: > Hi Peter and Pat, > > The RDF Working Group decided today [1] to resolve ISSUE-139 [2] (More clearly warn that "generalized RDF" is non-standard) by adopting David Booth's proposed language. The exact resolution was: > [[ > RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-139 using David Booth's proposed solution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Aug/0002.html. Exact wording will be considered editorial. > ]] > > Since neither of you were available for that portion of the call, I thought I should ask you whether you have any concerns or issues with the proposed resolution. I plan to make the changes in Concepts shortly if I don't hear anything negative from you. Thanks. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04#resolution_3 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/139 >
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:33:11 UTC