Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings

This is ISSUE-93, raised in August 2012 and closed soon after. The 
decision was "we do not give a name to this subset".

ISSUE-93: Give a name to "literals that are not language-tagged strings"
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/93


Richard's arguments to close the issue:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Aug/0172.html


Pat, however, made a proposal: "tagless literals".

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Aug/0181.html



AZ.



Le 04/07/2013 12:43, Markus Lanthaler a écrit :
> RDF Concepts currently only defines the subset of literals that are
> language-tagged strings. There's no name for literals that are not
> language-tagged strings. In JSON-LD we use "typed value" for that class of
> literals. I would like to propose to add such a definition to RDF Concepts.
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>

-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/

Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 13:19:55 UTC