Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45

On 5/19/13 5:33 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 5/19/13 4:42 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>>
>> As it has been pointed out before inlining is optional and servers 
>> that don't know how to do it just shouldn't.
>> I can see how this might be challenging in a vanilla implementation 
>> where the server merely stores triples blindly to regurgitate later 
>> but in the case of an application specific server it is not.
>>
>> Take for instance the case of a bug tracker in which I have a 
>> container listing all the bugs related to a given project. Inlining 
>> can be done without problems. If it can't then the server has a 
>> serious bug somewhere.
> If what you claim is true, can you back that up with a live 
> demonstration, zero speculation? Put such data out to make your point. 
> If not, then can't you see from this thread it is more trouble that it 
> is worth at this point in time.
>
> Back to you. I don't want to argue. You can back up your simplicity 
> claim with actual data and HTTP interactions. Doing that will save 
> everyone a would of time.

Meant to say: world of time.

Kingsley
>
> -- 
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web:http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile:https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen