- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:02:51 +0200
- To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi all, I made changes to the NIF sections http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#conversion-to-nif http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#nif-backconversion - conversion to NIF now uses http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5147 fragment identifiers https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/458 - NIF examples use stable NIF URI http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/ https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/460 - updated the predicates that are ITS specific so that they align with Jirka's / my comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Mar/0070.html that is, no XSD or any other datatype dependency for the range of RDF triples using the predicates. Please have a look. Dave, with this input document http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-HTML-whitespace-normalization does this NIF ouput http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/nif/EX-nif-conversion-output.xml has the right ITS ontology predicates for you? In the example I used three data categories: Translate, Elements Within Text, Text Analysis. I closed above action items, but to make sure the NIF entry in the references section is available and as a last health check before leaving last call, I created https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/481 Best, Felix
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 11:03:21 UTC