- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:54:35 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org, Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 16:54:58 UTC
On 2/18/13 11:38 AM, Mo McRoberts wrote: > In which case, I'd propose raising something which results in the following vote (or even straw poll?) in order to settle this: > > “Is it likely to be helpful to some readers of the spec to include a short note to explain the purpose of hash URIs in the examples, or is it likely to be otherwise confusing?” > > If the answer to that is 'the former', then we can look at tweaking the wording. Note: others have made the same vote request, earlier in this discussion [1]. I guess, those requests weren't clear enough. Ted: Please note the comments above (and those in Henry's response) in relation to making the issue raised [1] clearer. Links: [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2013Feb/0197.html [2]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/74 -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 16:54:58 UTC