- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:05:48 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Tim, Feel free to close this on my account, whichever way you finally go on the numbers in the top-level lists. #g -- On 28/01/2013 14:56, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Tracker, this is ISSUE-461 > > May we close this issue now? > > As a follow-on, Graham is asking for the entry numbers in the top level list, too. I have reservations about doing this but promised that I would explore it. > I believe that this issue is closed, and this follow-on request is worthy of another issue that could use more support from others if it is an important editorial feature that the group thinks we need. > > Thanks, > Tim > > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Tim, >> >> I took a look at this, and I think it does indeed address the concern I raised concerning finding entries in a dead-tree copy of the specification. Thank you for this. >> >> I have a suggestion (but I'm not putting it any more strongly than that) that the grouped summaries of PROV-O terms (e.g. at the top of sections 4.1, 4.2, etc.) might usefully include the term number, e.g. as: >> >> (1) prov:Entity (2) prov:Activity (3) prov:Agent >> >> #g >> -- >> >> >> >> On 20/01/2013 16:40, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>> prov-wg, >>> >>> In response to our discussions at the last F2F and ACTION-116, I have added http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#cross-reference-index to the latest draft of PROV-O. >>> >>> On the way towards implementing the index, I have also reordered the terms listed in http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#prov-o-at-a-glance >>> >>> The order of the terms is derived from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/ontology/term-order.csv >>> >>> Any feedback on these changes is welcome. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 19:11:43 UTC