- From: Tadej Štajner <tadej.stajner@ijs.si>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:56:18 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>, Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, Artūrs Vasiļevskis <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>
Hi, Felix, Phil, maybe 'tanRefs' was misleading. the intention was to point to an its:textAnalysisAnnotations, element which could in turn contain contain several its:textAnalysisAnnotation elements that all describe the same fragment. Is this valid usage of the its:textAnalysisAnnotations, or was it only meant to be a container for the individual rules? I was looking at this example for inspiration: http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/xml/EX-locQualityIssue-local-2.xml Alternatively, having multiple values would also work equivalently, then we could point to individual textAnalysisAnnotation statements. -- Tadej On 29. 01. 2013 10:41, Felix Sasaki wrote: > Thanks, Phil. Tadej, was the intention of its:tanRefs at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0212.html > > to have several pointers, e.g. allow for > its:tanRefs="tan1 tan2 tan3" > or just one, that is only "tan1"? > > Best, > > Felx > > > Am 29.01.13 10:34, schrieb Phil Ritchie: >> All >> >> @Felix: "But while doing that a question on the LQI/Provenance >> implementers: is it a feature that you point to just one external >> standoff >> unit, or an oversight, and it could it be several ones?" >> >> My current thinking is that stand-off stores many annotations for one >> segment. This is because if several segments are linked to one stand-off >> block, then if one of those segments needs to have another unique issue >> registered against it, you have to copy the stand-off, add the unique >> annotation and change the reference id's so that the link is between the >> segment with the additional annotation and the copied stand-off. >> Complex. >> >> Another argument for pointing to a single stand-off is that although the >> "classification" attributes of the markup might be identical (e.g. >> loc-quality-issue-type="style" loc-quality-issue-severity="75") each may >> have a different loc-quality-issue-comment to highlight the specific >> nature >> of the error. >> >> Hmm. The benefit of the id being on the segment/element and the idRefs >> being on the stand-off really comes into its own if you want to have >> multiple annotations across many data categories for the same >> segment/element. >> >> <span id="loaded">blah</span> >> >> <its:prov ref="loaded"... >> <its:locQualityIssues ref="loaded"... >> <its:textAnalysis ref="loaded" >> (on the train, I know this is not valid markup.) >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> On 28 Jan 2013, at 19:57, "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> But while doing that a question on the LQI/Provenance implementers: >>> is it >> a feature that you point to just one external standoff unit, or an >> oversight, and it could it be several ones? >> >> >> ************************************************************ >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify >> the sender immediately by e-mail. >> >> www.vistatec.com >> ************************************************************ >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 09:58:03 UTC