- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:42:47 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Re. ISSUE-97: Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? I suggest we close it and do nothing. The implications of the change would be important. If such a thing was done, all reasoners would have to be reimplemented, because the change adds a lot of entailments inferred from the empty graph. Nonetheless, I made a wiki page where I put the formal definitions of simple-entailment, lv-entailment, rdf-entailment, rdfs-entailment and D-entailment when these notions are made independent from a vocabulary. http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Azimmerm/RDF-semantics Best, -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 18:43:19 UTC