Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it from Andy Seaborne on 2012-09-20 (public-ldp-wg@w3.org from September 2012)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:03:14 +0100
To: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
CC: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <505B1412.8010000@epimorphics.com>

>> store - multiple graphs, flat structure - is not necessary.  Do you want
>
>> to constraint
>
> I think you got chopped off here.

Sorry - easiest fix is to chop again:

s/Do you want to constraint //

	Andy

>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
> http://open-services.net
>

Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 13:03:49 UTC