- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:50:50 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 11:25 AM 8/31/2005 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/08/QA-handbook-ed-20050831.html > >It should be ready to publish now. > >I have validated it, but not done a full pubrules verification. Actually, I do have one simple question. Currently, the index to GL/GP looks like: ># Good Practice 1: Decide as soon as possible — will the Working Group >build test materials or acquire them? ># Good Practice 2: Think about and enumerate the quality-related >deliverables that might help the Working Group through the Recommendation >track. ># Good Practice 3: Synchronize quality-related deliverables and their >development milestones with specification milestones. These are a bit long for the toc/index layout. The ideal solution would be a careful rewrite to shorten the GLs and GPs themselves, and move extra wording into "What means", "Why care", etc. But that's too much work for now. Should we abbreviate the representation of the GPs in the index? For example: ># Good Practice 1: ... build test materials or acquire them? ># Good Practice 2: ... enumerate the quality-related deliverables ... ># Good Practice 3: Synchronize quality-related deliverables ... with >specification milestones. -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:50:56 UTC