SpecGL - techniques

• From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
• Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:10:11 -0400
• To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20041003190331.00ba1998@mailserver.nist.gov>

All
As I read through SpecGL, I noticed an inconsistency with the 
Techniques.  The Techniques are numbered.  Sometimes it seems that there is 
1 techniques with multiple steps.  Other times, there are multiple 
techniques (1 step each).  We need to devise a better numbering scheme.
Perhaps:
A)  T1, T2, T3 and  then within T2, a, b, c.
B)  1, 1.1, 1.2., 1.3, 2, 3


--lynne

Received on Sunday, 3 October 2004 23:10:30 UTC