- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:07:52 +0000
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Cc: pfps@research.bell-labs.com
Oops, I forgot to copy the original to rdf comments. Brian >Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:15:13 +0000 >To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com >From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> >Subject: pfps-18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary > >Peter, > >You made a last call comment which was recorded as a series of separate >comments against different documents: > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-17 >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-18 >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-19 >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-20 >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-21 > >In your response to the RDFCore WG's resolution of pfps-17 > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0505.html > >you accepted the WG's resolution and indicated that a similar resolution >was acceptable for the other documents. > >Regarding the comments against the other docs pfps-18,19,20,21, the >RDFCore WG has resolved: > >[[ o throughout the docs > - the term [xml namespace] be used to refer to xml namespaces > - the term [vocabulary] be used to refer to collections of names > (RDF URI References] > o the editors update their docs accordingly > o bwm responds to pfps for all these issues >]] > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0124.html > >Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating >whether this decision is acceptable. > >Brian McBride
Received on Friday, 21 March 2003 08:07:46 UTC