- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:54:41 +0100
- To: janowicz@ucsb.edu, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "Cox, Simon (CESRE, Kensington)" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
Hi Krzysztof, You're arguing about any sosa/ssn classes in general while I'm discussing specific classes on which there seem to be an agreement to get rid of most of the axioms. I don't see why sosa could not re-use specific ssn classes on which there is little or no axiomatization, and even worse, define a new class with exactly the same annotation properties ... this is the fastest road to confuse developers. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Data Science Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:55:15 UTC