- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:40:15 -0800
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Oh, I failed to notice that rel=bookmark was explicitly mentioned in the issue. That's a different situation. I'll have to confer with my fellow co-chairs about this. - Maciej On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Yes, anything that's not covered in the issue can be raised as a separate bug. > > - Maciej > > On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> On 02.03.2011 18:39, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> ... >>> ... >>> f) ISSUE-124: rel-limits, Straw Poll for Objections closed Feb 28 >>> http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10412 >>> ... >> >> While following the bug link I realized that the CP for ISSUE-124 should have included the "bookmark" relation. I missed that. >> >> I assume I can re-raise this later on as LC bug, right? >> >> Best regards, Julian >> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 18:41:32 UTC