Re: Revised PROV-AQ

Re: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/working/prov-aq.html

Olaf: Good, thanks.  It's done.

(Also fixed up the WD document link)

Paul: I think we're ready to ask for final approval for next PWD.

#g
--

On 04/05/2012 08:05, Olaf Hartig wrote:
> Hey Graham,
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 22:19:43 Graham Klyne wrote:
>> Olaf,
>>
>> It seems I misunderstood what you were suggesting.
>>
>> I'd be quite happy to remove the qualifying text "also referred to as
>> resource on the Web" in the definition of resource - I wasn't especially
>> enamoured of it, but it seemed mostly harmless at the time.
>>
>> Is this (removal of text as indicated above) what you are suggesting?
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I'm suggesting ;-)
>
> Best,
> Olaf
>
>
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> #g
>> --
>>
>> On 03/05/2012 20:17, Olaf Hartig wrote:
>>> Hey Graham,
>>>
>>> Based on your recent changes I closed ISSUE-359 ISSUE-360 and ISSUE-361
>>>
>>> I'm not entirely happy with the change that you did in the context of
>>> ISSUE-358 [1]. More precisely, I don't like the first part of the current
>>>
>>> definition of 'Resource' in Sec.1.1. This part says:
>>>          "also referred to as resource on the Web"
>>>
>>> I propose to completely remove this part because our understanding of
>>> 'resource' (in line with the understanding in AWWW) is broader than just
>>> resources that are on the Web.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Olaf
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/358
>>>
>>> On Thursday 03 May 2012 18:42:54 Graham Klyne wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Since the teleconference today, I've made a couple of small further edits
>>>> to address outstanding issues 360 and 361 (issues submitted by Olaf).
>>>>
>>>> The current version of the document is now:
>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/82ac0204e878/paq/working/prov-aq.html
>>>>
>>>> At this point, there are just two outstanding issues, which I think may
>>>> have been rendered moot by other changes to the document and to the data
>>>> model.
>>>>
>>>> This is what we are proposing to release as the next working draft.
>>>>
>>>> #g
>>>> --
>

Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 07:59:50 UTC