Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] from Khalid Belhajjame on 2012-05-01 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from May 2012)

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:57:41 +0100
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Paolo Missier <pmissier@acm.org>
CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4FA02415.5040608@cs.man.ac.uk>

Hi Tim and Paolo,

I updated the ontology to include annotations that justify the hierarchy 
of sub-properties. In particular, was wasAttributedTo, wasDerivedFrom, 
derivedByInsertionFrom, derivedbyRemovalFrom, hadOriginalSource, 
wasQuotedFrom, and wasRevisionOf. Regarding the properties involved and 
involvee, the comments used for their annotation justify the existence 
of their su-properties, so I don't think we need to add justification 
for each of their direct sub-properties.

Please let me know if you are happy with the update and accept to close 
this issue.

PS: Tim, I updated the ProvenanceOntology.owl, I notice that there is 
also another file called ProvenanceOntologyFull.owl. I didn't update 
this one.

Thanks, khalid

On 24/02/2012 06:05, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/267
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
>
> all subproperty axioms need to be annotated to justify why they are subproperties.
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 17:58:06 UTC