- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:23:51 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/04/2012 03:45 PM, Anton Prowse wrote: >> fantasai: could be "for example, margin collapsing is not affected because >> [it is] based on computed values and not used values" > >> glazou: is fantasai's proposal a compromise you can live with? >> arronei: I think that what fantasai proposes is fine, with 'for example' >> prefix. May need some rewording. >> * fantasai wonders if dbaron is on the call >> RESOLVED: replace the sentence with Fantasai's proposal > > Did we resolve that? I thought that we resolved to do something /similar/ to that (that is, use "For example, margin > collapsing is unaffected because [...]") but with a view to possible rewording the second half of fantasai's proposal, as per > Arron's comment. > > At least, I'd like to mull the full sentence over for a short while before committing to it. I believe we did resolve on that, but would be open to editorial tweaking. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 00:24:22 UTC