- From: (unknown charset) Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:23:57 +0100
- To: (unknown charset) public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Folks, My understanding of Shane's proposal is as follows: > * http://coolnews.example.org/ > * http://coolnews.example.org/track.js Receive DNT;2 (it is the first party and there are some exceptions) [The site can query JS with the list of third parties that are required to operate to find out whether the exceptions are sufficient] > * http://weather.example.com/ Receives DNT;1 (third party and no exception) > * http://social.example.net/coolnews Receives DNT;1 (third party and no exception) [.net and not .org] > * http://tracker.example.org Receives DNT;0 (it is a third party and exempted) Karl: Does this answer your question? Shane: Did I understand correctly? Regards, matthias On 2/23/2012 10:08 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 30 janv. 2012 à 23:42, Shane Wiley a écrit : >> Description: >> Should the user agent send a different DNT value to a first party site if there exist site-specific exceptions for that first party? > > > * Paul's browser has a DNT:1 set. > * Paul's browser has a site-specific exception list for *.example.org > (issue: what is the format of that list) > * Paul is on a blog and follows a link to http://coolnews.example.org/ > * The browser creates an HTTP request to http://coolnews.example.org/ > * The resource (Web page) available at > has links to > * http://coolnews.example.org/track.js > * http://weather.example.com/ > * http://social.example.net/coolnews > > > What is happening? > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 18:24:36 UTC