- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:05:39 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
I forgot to specify while raising this issue that it is related to the ontology. On 26/02/2012 12:57, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/269 > > Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame > On product: > > > I find the term involved not intuitive. I thought of "related", but it is not great either. > > Additionally, I would suggest giving more structure to the sub-properties of involved, to reflect for example the kinds of domain and range involved, e.g., entity_entity_related, agent_agent_related, entity_activity_related, and activity_activity_related. Again we need some intuitive names for the new properties that we introduce. > > Khalid > > > >
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2012 13:06:03 UTC