- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:47:30 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Dave, that looks very interesting. I'll dig deeper. On 09/02/2012 17:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On 09/02/12 17:10, Phil Archer wrote: >> You are correct, Sarven, thank you. I have closed Issue-27. >> >> Right, now... how are we going to close Issue-12 ? :-) >> > > One possibility *might* be to consider Pronom from The National Archive. > > Pronom [1] is an online registry of technical information about file > formats, intended to support long term access to digital resources. > > There is a proposed vocabulary for rendering it as RDF [2] plus an > experimental RDF version with SPARQL endpoint and Linked Data API, see > [3]. The URIs themselves are not currently live (other than via the test > LDA endpoint). > > You could use pronom:file-format as the range without any commitment to > using the pronom instance URIs. > > If the pronom vocabulary meets the technical need but doesn't meet the > requirements for stability then maybe the GLD could adopt it :) > > I could enquire about the status of the Pronom linked data work if that > would be useful. > > Dave > > [1] http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/PRONOM > [2] > http://test.linkeddatapronom.nationalarchives.gov.uk/vocabulary/pronom-vocabulary.htm > > [3] > http://labs.nationalarchives.gov.uk/wordpress/index.php/2011/01/linked-data-and-pronom/ > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 17:47:58 UTC