- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:59:00 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Luc, Could you please close this issue, since wasScheduledAfter has been superseded? Thanks, khalid On 30/11/2011 12:45, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Khalid, > > This issue has been superseded by the latest WD. The controversial > wasScheduledAfter relation is replaced by a simpler wasStartedBy. > > I propose to close pending review. > Regards, > Luc > > On 10/04/2011 10:49 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-113: wasScheduledAfter is transitive [Conceptual Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/113 >> >> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame >> On product: Conceptual Model >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 16:59:16 UTC