- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:18:59 +0100
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On 12/20/2011 8:04 PM, Sid Stamm wrote: > David, > > My impression is "not enabled" in this context does *not* mean "DNT: 0". I think it means there is no HTTP header sent with requests. So yeah, "not stated" is the same as "not enabled". > > Should we make it clearer? Does it make sense to settle on "not enabled" to mean no header and "enabled but opt-in" or something as "DNT: 0"? > > -Sid > > Sid, David, Since DNT is tri-state, maybe it makes more sense to settle on "not defined". -- Rob
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 14:19:34 UTC