Re: ACTION-247: Clarification on what will remain in the Media Fragments URI specification

Hi Philip,

>> The proposal I have made that currently seems to gather consensus:
>> - A document named: "Media Fragments URI Basics" that will be closed
>> to what is currently published at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/
>> with a few removal, namely:
>> . Only two dimensions described for addressing fragment in a URI
>> (impact on section 4): temporal and spatial
>> . Only one unit to specify the temporal dimension: npt timecodes
>
> Which are the interoperable implementations of the spatial xywh syntax?

 From the implementation report, 
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-impl/ there 
is currently: meiafragment.js and Ninsuna.

 From the minutes of today's telecon, 
http://www.w3.org/2011/12/14-mediafrag-minutes.html#item02, we have 
scribed that you have already questioned in the past the validity of 
Thomas's implementation (as a polyphil) and therefore argued to not 
count it.
We have also said that this feature (#xywh) has triggered significant 
interests from other communities (namely CSS and SVG) and has also other 
implementations (although not tested yet), e.g. from Europeana, see [1] 
and [2].

Please let us know if you can live with this or not.
Best regards.

   Raphaël

[1] http://dme.ait.ac.at/annotation/
[2] http://yuma-js.github.com/index.html


-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 10:43:59 UTC