- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:58:40 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc, I'm fine with that. cheers, Paul Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Paul, > We are now formally closing this issue, since, strictly, a notion of > asserter is now formally > defined in the model. > There is still an open question, which we have written as a note in > prov-dm: should we > consider the asserter to be an agent itself (currently, the asserter is > just an IRI whose interpretation > is outside the scope of prov-dm). This can be raised as a separate issue. > Regards, > Luc > > On 08/22/2011 10:07 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> This issue was closed, pending review. >> Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we >> close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it, >> or create a more specific issue. >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> PS See note on this issue's page >> >> >> >> On 28/07/11 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with >>> respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/51 >>> >>> Raised by: Paul Groth >>> On product: Conceptual Model >>> >>> Asserter is a key part of the document. There are a number of places >>> it's mentioned. >>> >>> The definition of Provenance Container has the following note: >>> >>> "It should be possible for asserters to annotate the container with a >>> description of the justification for the assertions it contains, as >>> well as additional meta-information, such as authorship of the >>> assertions." >>> >>> The View/Account mention has the following: >>> >>> "an account is a set of assertions, forming a perspective on the world." >>> >>> Asserter should be defined. >>> >>> >>> >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 08:59:14 UTC