- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:52:26 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Is there any particular reason that PROV-DM needs to define a namespace URI? Doesn't the material there all stand on the abstract syntax model, which doesn't depend on URI-based namespaces? Just asking. #g -- On 20/10/2011 14:38, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:10, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> I think it's as you suggest. We may need extra namespace for anything that's >> not in the datamodel. > > > W3 guys - is it OK to delay deciding on this until after we've made > the first public draft of the ontology? > > > Should we have aliases in PROV-O for the matching ones? How would > users remember/know which term is from which namespace? > > # Example of aliasing > @prefix prov http://www.w3.org/ns/prov/ . > @prefix provo http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ . > # .. > > provo:Entity owl:sameAs prov:Entity . > provo:ProcessExecution owl:sameAs prov:ProcessExecution . > # ... > > prov:Entity a owl:Class . > prov:ProcessExecution a owl:Class . > # .. > > # only in provo: > provo:EntityInRole a owl:Class ; > rdfs:subPropertyOf provo:Entity . > >
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 13:53:06 UTC